Latest News and Updates

Radiologists Vote!

Dear Fellow Ohio State Radiological Society Member:

2018 Midterm Elections

We are within a week of the 2018 Midterm Election. In January, we will have a completely new administration with a new Governor and expected staffing shifts in every cabinet agency.  Every statewide office will have a new leader and the state legislature will have many new members and a likely shift in majority caucus and minority caucus numbers.  There are two important Ohio Supreme Court seats up for grabs. All 16 Congressional Districts have elections and U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown is being challenged by former Congressman Jim Renacci.  You’ve probably seen the ads and if you’re like me, you’re looking forward to them stopping the day AFTER the election, November 7th.

But first, you need to get to the polls!  You can vote early at your local Board of Elections or vote on election day — next Tuesday, November 6th.

Supreme Court Races

Moreover, the Supreme Courts candidates endorsed by the Ohio State Medical Association are Justice Mary DeGenaro and Judge Craig Baldwin.  Often overlooked, these elected positions are vitally important to physicians and to maintaining consistent medical liability laws in Ohio.  Mary DeGenaro and Craig Baldwin do not believe in “legislating from the bench” and will protect us from having unexpected shifts in the liability environment.

Of course, the Ohio Radiological Society Political Action Committee (ORSPAC) was able to support these candidates, but only with modest contributions.  We need to be doing more for Radiology.   Please consider joining the PAC and help our profession get stronger in Ohio.

At the Statehouse

Here’s are a few things happening in Columbus right now:

  • Medicaid created a portal for providers to share complaints about Managed Care Organizations.  Initial feedback is that it’s working.  If you have experience with it, please let us know what you think.  We are told the process takes 3 minutes, so do not hesitate to try it if you’re running into problems.
  • After the election, there will be a busy lame duck session (November-December).  We are watching many, many scope of practice bills regarding medical providers that would like to expand their independence and prescription authority.  CRNAs, Psychologists, Pharmacists, Physical Therapists, APRNs and others are seeking changes in scope of practice laws and consistently point out a shortage of physicians in rural Ohio as a main argument.
  • Regulatory Reform is on the horizon.  The Ohio Senate President has indicated that sweeping reforms are a priority for him in this lame duck session.
  • The Ohio Department of Health has released new draft rules that would create unnecessary regulations for Ohio Radiologists.  Many providers and even some policymakers acknowledge that there is no data to support a number of these burdensome regulatory changes.  There is a state law requiring that Ohio maintain standards no less stringent than the “suggested state regulations for control of radiation” by the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors.  Your OSRS is pushing back and fighting for the Department to find a solution that makes sense for you or seek a change in Ohio law.

Join the PAC

Again, take a minute and join the PAC.  If you donate a minimum of $200 a year, you’ll be a member of the President’s Club and have access to special events, but any amount is needed and appreciated.  Check it out and see how easy we’ve made it to give. (*corporate contributions are prohibited)

Thank you in advance for your much needed support.


Don’t Forget to Vote.


Eric C. Bourekas MD, MBA, FACR

President, Ohio State Radiological Society


OSRS Executive Committee Members

Eric Bourekas, MD, MBA, FACR – President

Mark Sands, MD, FACR – Secretary

Yogesh Patel, MD, FACR – Treasurer

Tom Nogueira, MD, Past-President


read more
Rachel WinderRadiologists Vote!

OSRS at the Ohio Statehouse

The Spring Session is winding down at the Ohio Statehouse.  We have a new Speaker of the House and just 2 Session days left before they break for the Summer.  Oftentimes, the legislature will be back once or twice in the Fall before the election and then in full swing during Lame Duck after the election.

A few items to highlight:

Cultural Competency:  SB 16 with would require health care professionals to complete instruction in cultural competency received a hearing this week.  Many witnesses testifying in support of the bill said that the business case for culturally and linguistically appropriate services help health care organizations’ bottom line and improve health outcomes.  They also stated that improved communication helps avoid malpractice suits and improves patient compliance with health care professionals’ recommendations.  The bill has had two hearings in Senate Health, Human Services and Medicaid Committee.

Physical Therapy Diagnosis:  HB 131 originally would have allowed Physical Therapists to make a medical diagnosis and order imaging.  The current version that passed the House and received its second hearing in the Senate Health, Human Services and Medicaid Committee last week would simply allow a Physical Therapists to make a “therapy” diagnosis which is defined to specifically exclude a “medical” diagnosis.

Physician Assistants:  SB 259 proposes to streamline the process for becoming a PA in Ohio.  Changes include increasing the ratio of PAs supervised by a physician from 3 to 5;  allows supervision agreements to remain onsite rather than filing them with the OSMB; and reduces the requirements for PAs if the PA practiced at least 1000 hours in the military or with a public health service among other changes.  After a few changes to the bill, he OSMA has taken a position of neutral.

  • Separately, we are aware there are efforts by radiologist assistants at the Federal level to recognize RAs as non-physician providers under Medicare.  If successful, that would likely expand efforts by Radiology Assistants to reduce supervision requirements here in Ohio.

Telemedicine:  HB 546 would prohibit health benefit plans from treating telemedicine services differently from in-person health care services.  The provision was part of the Budget Bill last year in the House, but was removed in the Senate.  It received its third hearing in House Health Committee.

Right to Shop:  HB 399 would allow a patient to choose wherever he or she would like to go for a medical procedure and not be required to choose the least expensive option.  The patient can choose to apply any shared savings incentive to their out-of-pocket costs.  HB 399 is a proposed compromise to the Health Care Transparency legislation that was blocked by a lawsuit.  HB 399 received its first hearing last week.

Please contact Victor Goodman ( or Rachel Winder ( if you would like additional information.

Support your profession and donate today:

read more
Rachel WinderOSRS at the Ohio Statehouse

Ohio House Members Vote to Elect Ryan Smith (R-Bidwell) as Speaker of the House

As you may have heard by now, Ohio elected Rep. Ryan Smith, the Chair of the Ohio House Finance Committee, as Speaker of the Ohio House in dramatic fashion yesterday.  The post was vacant after Speaker Cliff Rosenberger resigned amid an FBI investigation.

The rules require that the majority of the members present vote to elect the Speaker.  Rep. Smith would have needed 46 votes because of the absence of some members on the House Floor.  He was able to secure 44 votes.  There was a small faction of Republicans that support Larry Householder (R-Glenford) for Speaker in 2019 who voted for other candidates; and almost the entire minority caucus voted for their minority leader, Fred Strahorn (D-Dayton).  Four of the members absent, if present, were Smith supporters and would have provided the votes necessary for him to reach support of the majority of the members present.

Because Rep. Smith could not gain the support of the majority of the members present, a law exists in the Ohio Revised Code that allows a speaker to be elected by a plurality of votes, but only after ten votes are taken.

So…. 2 ½  hours later, after an individual voice vote for all 91 members present voted TEN times each, on the eleventh vote, Speaker Smith was formally elected and sworn in as Ohio’s newest Speaker of the Ohio House.



Ohio Revised Code

101.21 Majority required to tenth voting.

A majority of the votes given at an election for an officer of either house shall be necessary to elect. If a choice is not made on or before the tenth voting, the person thereafter receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected.


read more
Rachel WinderOhio House Members Vote to Elect Ryan Smith (R-Bidwell) as Speaker of the House

Check-in: What’s Happening at the Ohio Statehouse?

It’s campaign season in Ohio!  You’ve likely noticed when you turn on your local television station or open up your Facebook page or Twitter feed or even your newspaper for those of us that still read them.  The current Governor, John Kasich, is term-limited and the race is on to see who will succeed him.  The primary election is scheduled for May 8, 2018.  The Republican field consists of the current Attorney General Mike DeWine and the current Lt. Governor Mary Taylor.  The Democrat hopefuls include Richard Cordray, most recently the director for the Federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, former Cleveland Mayor and Congressman Dennis Kucinich, State Senator Joe Schiavoni, and former Ohio Supreme Court Justice William O’Neill.

The Speaker of the House, Cliff Rosenberger, resigned abruptly this month announcing he was being investigated by the FBI for possible campaign finance violations.  There are at least two representatives that would like to succeed him and are waging aggressive campaigns in Columbus and in House district seats throughout Ohio.  Every other statewide seat is open this year along with two seats on the Ohio Supreme Court.  2018 is sure to be an interesting election year.

Meanwhile at the Statehouse, although they are taking a break before the primary election, discussions continue on issues affecting the practice of medicine.  Here is a brief summary of a few of the bills.  Click on the links to learn more:

HB72 STEP THERAPY PROTOCOLS (JOHNSON T, ANTONIO N) To adopt requirements related to step therapy protocols implemented by health plan issuers and the Department of Medicaid.
Current Status:    4/11/2018 – House Health , (Fifth Hearing)
State Bill Page:

HB131 PHYSICAL THERAPY LAWS (GAVARONE T, REINEKE W) To modify the laws governing the practice of physical therapy.  The original version of the bill allowed Physical Therapists to order imaging, but that language has since been removed.
Current Status:     4/11/2018 – PASSED BY HOUSE; Vote 95-0
State Bill Page:

HB145 IMPAIRED MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS (HUFFMAN S, SPRAGUE R) To provide for the establishment of a confidential program for the treatment of certain impaired practitioners and to declare an emergency.
Current Status:      2/8/2018 – SIGNED BY GOVERNOR; eff. immediately
State Bill Page:

HB273  PHYSICIAN CERTIFICATION (GAVARONE T) To prohibit a physician from being required to secure a maintenance of certification as a condition of obtaining licensure, reimbursement, or employment or obtaining admitting privileges or surgical privileges at a hospital or health care facility.
Current Status:      10/25/2017 – House Health , (Third Hearing)
State Bill Page:

HB317  PRO BONO HEALTHCARE DEDUCTION (YOUNG R) To authorize, for six years, a personal income tax deduction for a physician based on the number of hours the physician provides uncompensated medical services through a hospital, free clinic, or nongovernmental medical organization.
Current Status:    3/20/2018 – SUBSTITUTE BILL ACCEPTED, House Ways and Means, (Third Hearing)
State Bill Page:

HB416  HEALTH PRICE TRANSPARENCY (HUFFMAN S) Regarding the provision of cost estimates for scheduled health care services and health care services requiring insurer preauthorization.
Current Status:      3/7/2018 – House Insurance, (Third Hearing)
State Bill Page:

HB536  HEALTH INSURANCE-EMERGENCY COVERAGE (REECE A) To prohibit health plan issuers, including those participating in the Medicaid care management system, from implementing any form of selective emergency services coverage.
Current Status:   3/21/2018 – House Insurance, (First Hearing)
State Bill Page:

HB546  TELEMEDICINE-HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS (PATTON T) To prohibit health benefit plans from treating telemedicine services differently from in-person health care services solely because they are provided as telemedicine services.
Current Status:   4/11/2018 – House Health , (First Hearing)
State Bill Page:

SB16   HEALTH CARE CULTURE COMPETENCY (TAVARES C) To require certain health care professionals to complete instruction in cultural competency.
Current Status:   3/7/2017 – Senate Health, Human Services and Medicaid, (First Hearing)
State Bill Page:

There are also ongoing discussions about finding pathways to use protocol for contrast and physician reimbursement for surprise out of network non-coverage among other important issues.

There is a lot more to do, but we need resources — especially during election year!   Please consider a donation to the ORSPAC in the $25 – $250 range.  The ORSPAC needs your support today, to help ensure a bright tomorrow for Ohio’s professional radiology community.

It takes only a minute.  Please click the secure link below.

*The ORSPAC cannot accept corporate contributions and all contributions are voluntary.

Thank you for investing in the future of our profession.

If you have any questions on this information or any other issues, feel free to reach out to one of your advocates, Victor Goodman at or Rachel Winder at




read more
Rachel WinderCheck-in: What’s Happening at the Ohio Statehouse?

New Ohio Bill Seeks Medical Price Transparency

Gongwer News

November 14, 2017

Ohioans who need certain medical procedures would be able to get detailed cost estimates before undergoing the processes under legislation detailed by a House Republican on Tuesday.

Rep. Steve Huffman (R-Tipp City) said the bill would impact procedures that require prior authorization, helping consumers shop for providers and facilities that might have lower rates.

The bill would succeed a related two-year-old law that has never been implemented due to an ongoing court challenge, he said.  That provision was included in a BWC budget bill (HB52, 131st General Assembly), and was challenged in court by a coalition of medical organizations.

Mr. Huffman, who chairs the House Health Committee, said patients, hospitals and physicians want transparency in the system, and the bill would help achieve that goal.

The cost estimates would require providers to offer a good-faith estimate of costs, including the expected cost to the patient and information about whether the provider is out of the patient’s insurance network.  Some patients, he added, trust their doctors and hospitals and won’t seek the information.

Regardless, the information would help patients make more informed decisions about their care, the lawmaker said.

Rep. Huffman said he envisions the process being implemented for procedures that don’t require prior authorization in the future.  He added that the bill doesn’t address emergency situations, and other cases when time might be of the essence.


The bill is supported by the OHA and the OSMA both stating that it provides an appropriate level of expectation and responsibility on both the provider and the insurer.

read more
Rachel WinderNew Ohio Bill Seeks Medical Price Transparency

Ohio Bill on Tomosynthesis Coverage Receives Statehouse Hearing

Ohio Senate Bill 121, which would include tomosynthesis in the definition of screening mammography for insurance purposes, received its second hearing in the Senate Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee recently.  Below is an article that was included in a statehouse news publication, Gongwer, summarizing the hearing and the support the OSRS received from the medical community.  No additional hearings have been scheduled.  Let Chairman Hottinger know how tomosynthesis impacts your patients and ask for passage of Senate Bill 121.

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Witnesses Support Bill Requiring Insurers To cover Mammogram Procedure

Doctors and provider groups urged a Senate panel Tuesday to back a bill that would require insurers to cover a new form of mammogram as a way to assist in the detection of breast cancer.

Victor Goodman, representing the Ohio State Radiological Society, told the Senate Insurance and Financial Institutions Committee that the state has required insurers to cover screening mammography since 1997.  The bill, SB 121, would require insurers to cover tomosynthesis as a part of breast cancer screenings.

He predicted opponents would likely say the bill imposes a new coverage mandate on insurers, but the General Assembly in the past acknowledged that new technology would be developed for mammography.

“This is not a new mandate,” he said.  “It’s something that’s been part of the Ohio Revised Code essentially since 1997.”

Dr. Bang Huynh, a radiologist with Columbus Radiology from Grant Hospital, said the tomosynthesis process, also known as 3D mammography, has improved detection rates.

“The reason cancer detection is so important is the earlier we are able to detect it, the better we are able to treat the patient,” he said.

Senator Bob Hackett (R-London) asked if the 2D mammography is always done first.

“You don’t have the option of deciding after you do the 2D whether to do the tomo or not,” he said.  Any subsequent test would be a diagnostic test, not a screening test covered as preventative care.

Senator Dave Burke (R-Marysville) said the General Assembly would be legislating how a procedure should happen at a physician’s office.

Dr. Huynh said he didn’t think of the bill as mandating what is being done in a doctor’s office.

“I don’t really see how this would force anybody to do anything that’s against their interests,” he said.

Senator Burke asked why an insurer would deny someone a procedure that could be potentially beneficial.

Dr. Huynh said until recently a lot of insurers were not covering tomosynthesis.

“I would ask them, why would not cover something that could be beneficial to patients?” he said.

Camille Grubbs, with Hologic, a manufacturer of breast tomosynthesis technology, said the technology is no longer considered experimental or investigational.

Judy Brandell, a nurse navigator at Mercy Health Fairfield Hospital, said in written testimony that insurance coverage of tomosynthesis and 3D mammography can be confusing for patients.

“Women are often confused and intimidated by their insurance coverage and the changes from year to year,” she wrote.  “So if the technologists and nurses don’t know for sure if they are covered, they end up declining due to potential additional and unknown costs.  From my perspective, it’s especially frustrating that the younger age range, who more frequently have dense and sometimes extremely dense breast tissue, will decline due to the inconsistency of coverage.”

The Ohio State Medical Association, Ohio Society of Radiologic Technologists, Ohio State University Medical Center and OhioHealth offered written testimony in support of the bill.



read more
Rachel WinderOhio Bill on Tomosynthesis Coverage Receives Statehouse Hearing

Ohio SB 121 to Include Tomosynthesis as Screening Mammography

Great news!! Legislation that was initiated by the Ohio State Radiological Society was introduced in Ohio today by Senator John Eklund (R-Munson Twp) to include “Tomosynthesis” as part of the required screening mammography benefits under health insurance policies.  Senate Bill 121 can be viewed at this link under “current version”.

We will keep you posted as the bill is assigned to committee and advocacy opportunities are presented.


read more
Rachel WinderOhio SB 121 to Include Tomosynthesis as Screening Mammography

A Letter to Radiologists – past and future

Please take a moment to read this letter from one of your professions’ most passionate advocates and consider investing a little –  to help the future be as successful as the past.  Thank you, Dr. Olsen.

Donate Now

Letter to Current and Future Radiologists:

From: John Olsen Emeritus OSU Faculty member   

Dear Colleagues:

A few of you remember me. Many of you I haven’t met, but I was on the OSU Radiology faculty for 36 years, 1976-2012.  I am writing to share some thoughts but mostly to ask you to share your money with what I feel are very worthy supporters of your own well-being.  As institutions change and more radiologists become salaried employees, there is a tendency to think “the institution will look after me”, or “I can’t do very much relative to my situation anyway”.  I assure you that neither of these ideas could be further from the truth.

I want to make an appeal for and justification of organized radiology and organized medicine with the hope of encouraging your participation, even if that means as little as only paying dues and giving financial support. Your status in the Ohio State Medical Community and your position in the new payment systems depends mostly on two things, and one of these is not the Chairman’s negotiating ability, as important as that is.  The first is how well each of you is perceived as creating value here at Ohio State and the second is how well organized radiology both is and is perceived as a creator of value within the universe of medicine.  Many of you instinctively do all the right things to be valued consultants and helpmates to our patients and clinical colleagues.  For the rest of us, adapting the American College of Radiology (ACR) imaging 3.0 concepts can set us on the right course for the future.  Also, as a Department, employing data organized with ACR guidelines can aid in illustrating our value in the Health System.  The ACR has favorably shaped the economic environment of radiology practice to the benefit of all radiologists for over 60 years.  They also offer excellent training programs in leadership, management, business and human resources among others all designed for the busy radiologist.   I urge you to join the ACR and to contribute to the ACR Political Action Committee (RADPAC).

The egregious multiple procedure payment reduction, as an example, was not recently made less egregious because it was unfair but through intense lobbying of Congress. The recent budget resolution requiring computer order entry with decision support and not radiology benefit managers, is constructive for our specialty, but things like this do not happen by accident.

Here in Ohio, the Department of Health was about to adapt a policy promulgated by the Pharmacy Board that all radiology contrast would have to be injected by a physician and not by technologists.  This would have been disruptive to radiology practice, and it came down to the wire that the Ohio Radiological Society (ORS) was able to induce the Pharmacy Board to withdraw the proposal already agreed to by the Health Department over our objection. When you join ACR you also join ORS.

All government organs basically want to help, but any policy change or action has winners and losers, and it takes vigilance and money not to come out on the short end. Every one of us should contribute both to RADPAC and to the Ohio Radiology Society Political Action Committee (ORSPAC) for which you have an addressed stamped envelope.  Soon online contributions will also be possible.  Every member of Columbus Radiology (Grant Hospital) contributes regularly to both RADPAC and ORSPAC.  The ACR knows them well as one of the groups with 100% participation.

The Pharmacy Board success described above was achieved by our attorney Victor Goodman who has been essential for much of our success. Victor and his colleague Rachel have relationships with most of the Ohio Government such that much of what might affect Radiology is communicated to them well before getting to the proposal stage.  Their service has been invaluable through the years but it is not free, and were it not for our historical relationship such effective help might be beyond our means.  Victor and Rachel are paid out of the ORS legal budget.  Rachel manages ORSPAC but ORSPAC expenses are also in the legal budget.  All contributions to ORSPAC go to supporting legislators, judges and candidates favorable to radiology to assist in their elections.

As the ACR is our political and socioeconomic organization, the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) is our scientific organization. Both RSNA and ACR are among the most effective organizations in organized medicine, and we are truly blessed to have them and the great leaders who created and continue to recreate them.  I wish all radiologists belonged to both.  I want to make an appeal for the Research and Education Fund of the RSNA.  Before creating this fund Radiology was at a serious disadvantage.  The public could identify with Heart Disease, Cancer, Arthritis, etc., so the respective organizations had an easier path for fundraising, but no one suffers from or dies of Radiology.  Radiology was several generations behind most of medicine in terms of raising money to fund research. The Research and Education Fund has been an amazing success but needs continuous ongoing support.  Grants from the fund have been multiplied forty fold by grantees obtaining additional funding from other sources such as the NIH.

Radiology has been good to me and my family, so I continue to support the future of Radiology, but we should all advance the future of our specialty by contributing generously to the Research and Education fund of the RSNA.

I have unashamedly just asked you to give away (invest) more than a little money.  I would like to provide some not intuitive money wisdom.  Long term department members might inform the younger and newer that I do have some knowledge in this area.    Money has an amazing property.  No matter how much you have or make, it will never be enough until you are giving some away.   Anyone who tithes can tell you that giving creates inner financial peace and actually enhances your ability to enjoy life that spending cannot compare with.  You will not miss what you give and what givers have left becomes enough. (This magic only works with what is freely given and not what is surrendered to coercion which has a different effect).

Please support yourself and Radiology by joining ACR which includes ORS and supporting RADPAC (National) and ORSPAC (Ohio) and joining the RSNA and supporting The Research and Education Fund. If you follow your money with active participation, so much the better.

Your support for all or any of the above would be of great benefit to yourself and your field but this is only part of the story.   There are broader issues requiring attention. The Ohio State Medical Association (OSMA) has been essential to the well-being of all Ohio citizens and physicians.   This includes for example dealing with unfair practices of medical insurance companies, guiding legislation and medical malpractice and tort reform.   The favorable malpractice climate in Ohio is the direct result of intense work by OSMA members and staff even including electing Ohio Supreme Court justices who interpret the law rather than legislate law from the bench. (In fact losing several favorable justices on the Ohio Supreme Court next November could undo 15 plus years of successful effort and renew the malpractice crisis.)

I would like to describe an episode mostly known only to those who deal with medical billing where only OSMA was able to fix a serious problem. Since the start of Medicare, Ohio Medicine had constructive relationships with Nationwide and then with Palmetto as our Medicare insurance carriers.   When CGS became the carrier they brought incredibly backward business methods that compromised physician payments and they were callously unresponsive to physicians and their representatives.  In addition, the Medical Director seemed to have a particular animus towards Radiology.  Because of the CGS performance, OSMA enlisted our senators Sherrod Brown and Rob Portman to arrange a meeting with Kathleen Sibelius the then Secretary of Health and therefore head of CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services) to discuss the Ohio situation.   CGS was ordered to correct all deficiencies or lose the Medicare contract.    CGS  immediately modernized their business practices, and they also replaced the Medical Director who was antagonistic to Radiology.  The new Directors Dr. Earl Berman for Part B and Dr. Michael Montijo for Part A are excellent leaders, supportive of physicians and working hard to make the system work well for all three constituents, patients, physicians and the federal government.   Radiology could not have resolved this issue, only OSMA representing all Ohio member physicians could succeed.

An anecdote… The Ohio Radiological Society and the radiologists of Kentucky (the other CGS state) worked together on our particular CGS problem to share costs, demonstrate solidarity, and avoid duplication of effort.   During the joint OSMA/ CMS discussions with CGS, at one point CGS claimed that all the problems were unique to Ohio.  OSMA soundly refuted CGS based on the ORS work with Kentucky…. And this ended the last shred of CGS credibility.

OSMA performs valuable service to the medical community but as more physicians become salaried (over 50% as of two years ago) the membership of OSMA is declining.   OSMA is just as important for salaried physicians but the value is not yet as well recognized.  Also declining are contributions to the OSMA political action committee (PAC).  Last year the Nursing Association PAC raised 40% more money than the physicians which is not a good situation as nursing continues to lobby the legislature to allow more encroachment on the practice of medicine.    The Trial Lawyers Association PAC which works to undo our favorable Ohio malpractice situation has 60% more money than OSMAPAC.

Two years ago in a major policy change implemented in hope of increasing physician participation, it was no longer required that OSMA members also join the local county medical society or that local members join the State. Our local society, years ago known as the Franklin County Academy of Medicine and now called the Columbus Medical Association (CMA), performs valuable services to the community.  While many physicians participate in various specific programs, most of the leadership function is provided by about 25 physicians eager for your help.  CMA programs such as the Free Clinic are worthwhile and a great way to meet other physicians and serve your community.  Resident and medical student participation is welcome as it is in the RSNA and ACR/ORS.

Dr. Rick Nelson in Emergency Medicine is very active in both organizations and would be happy to provide a more complete and up to date perspective but these organizations are important to the health of medicine, and a strong OSMA is especially important for Radiology.

Please remember your contributions to ORSPAC, RADPAC and the Research and Education fund of the RSNA and join the respective organizations if not already a member.   Also please give thought to joining and supporting at least one of the non-radiology organizations.

A review of Ohio Radiological Society achievements would include:

When Ohio Medicaid was revised by Governor Kasich we negotiated favorable terms for radiology that avoided most of the cuts experienced by other providers.

In the recent Breast Density Legislation, we Influenced the bill language and composed the wording of the patient notification letters even though we opposed the legislation as an intrusion on medical practice.  We made the bill as innocuous as possible and excluded it from being the basis of any malpractice action.

Successfully maintaining the Ohio Department of Health’s education and training standard for all applications of therapeutic radiation.  (Same as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission standard.)   Dermatology was asking for a dispensation from the rules so they could use their own in office equipment to employ therapeutic amounts of ionizing radiation to treat patients with skin cancer without obtaining the requisite training, and had garnered some political support to allow this.

Radiology Assistant Legislation defining practice guidelines and disallowing independent practice.  This in response to a legislative proposal to recognize Radiology Assistants as independent practitioners.

Telemedicine Legislation requiring an Ohio Medical License for out of state practitioners providing services to patients located in Ohio.    (Several legislators consistently referred to this bill which affects all Ohio Medicine as the “Radiology Bill”)

Legislation requiring that hospitals billing globally for screening mammograms must actually pay the agreed payment to the radiologist.  Bill also separately required additional payment for digital mammography and CAD.

Regular interaction with State Agencies, OSMA and Medicare and “ad hoc” with legislators and other organizations.

Legislation allowing patient self- referral for Screening Mammograms at a time when Ohio law required physician referral for all ionizing radiation.  This included Ohio adopting the ACR’s MQSA standards well before they were a Federal requirement.

Legislation requiring the licensing of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine technologists and assisting the Ohio Department of Health in writing and maintaining the resultant rules.

read more
Rachel WinderA Letter to Radiologists – past and future

Radiation Advisory Council Saved Upon Signature of Governor Kasich

We were reminded of an important lesson this month to never take your eyes off of the legislature. 

In an effort that we organized back in May which we believed had saved the Ohio Radiation Advisory Council (RAC) from sunset against the formal testimony of the Ohio Department of Health, instead, was only a temporary solution as the RAC was moved back to the “sunset” column during the craziest of legislative seasons, known as Lame Duck Session.

We quickly went to work and with the help of Dr. Paul Geis and Dr. John Olsen among others, we put on a full court press.

We are proud (and relieved) to announce that Ohio Governor John Kasich signed House Bill 471 this week that formally and statutorily retains the Radiation Advisory Council.

See the pertinent language here:  HB471 RAC Retention.

It is the efforts of your peers and your advocates at the Ohio State Radiological Society that are directly responsible for making sure that the issues impacting your industry are prioritized within the Ohio Department of Health.

Congratulations and thank you for your continued support of the OSRS.




read more
Rachel WinderRadiation Advisory Council Saved Upon Signature of Governor Kasich